Let’s find out ‘Balenciaga Campaign Controversy: What Happened To Nicholas Des Jardins?’ Nicholas Des Jardins became controversial after a 25 million dollar lawsuit was filed against her and the production company by a French fashion brand.
When the news about Nicholas Des Jardins became public, people became more interested in learning more about the controversy.
Balenciaga Campaign Controversy: What Happened To Nicholas Des Jardins?
Nicholas Des and North six, an independent production company, were commissioned to create advertising campaigns for the Company’s spring/summer collection.
The purse was shown on top of documents on a table in the Instagram advertisement. A court ruling concerning child pornography was partially visible in the background.
On Monday, Balenciaga confirmed that the papers were from the 2008 Supreme Court case, which determined that prohibiting the promotion of child pornography was not unconstitutional.
According to Balenciaga, the North Six advertisement was intended to present random documents in the background and “was aimed at replicating a business office environment.”
According to the statement, “all of the material used in this shoot was provided by third parties who confirmed in writing that these props were false office documents.” “They turned out to be genuine legal documents, most likely from the production of a television drama.”
Balenciaga Suing Set Designer Nicholas Des Jardins And North Tv- What Happened?
Balenciaga is suing North Six and its set designer Nicholas Des for causing significant damage as a result of an advertising campaign that Balenciaga hired them to produce.”
“Members of the public, including the media,” according to Balenciaga, “have falsely associated Balenciaga with the repulsive and profoundly disturbing subject of the court’s ruling.”
Balenciaga filed a lawsuit in Manhattan against the production company late Friday, alleging that the documents were used without Balenciaga’s knowledge.
According to Nicholas’ agent, Gabriel Maussaieff, the post and papers used in the ad were rental pieces obtained from prop House, which is used in films and photo shoots.
“Everyone from Balenciaga was on the shoot and worked on editing every image in post-production,” he added. Maussaieff also claimed that Balenciaga is using her client as a scapegoat.
Many customers have questioned what they see as the brand’s attempts to deflect blame from the situation.
Balenciaga approved the final image before posting it on social media; it appears unlikely that Balenciaga’s contract with third-party creative must include the term stating that Balenciaga has complete ownership of the image before it is posted.
Balenciaga stated that it is continuing its investigation into the matter and accepts responsibility for the lack of oversight and control over the Campaign images.
Balenciaga recently sparked yet another controversy with a campaign depicting children cuddling fetishized teddy bears.
“We vehemently oppose child abuse and never intended for it to be a part of our story,” Balenciaga said. “This was a bad decision; we should not have shown our cuddly bear bags and the Gift collection with children,” Balenciaga said.
Kim Kardashian, a Balenciaga brand ambassador, has stated that she is “re-evaluating” her relationship with the company. The unsettling sights had left her “shaken.”
